Death of Portsmouth man Daniel Varndell needs to spark urgent change, coroner and family declare

A DAD-OF-ONE who was a ‘serious risk’ to himself and others died from an overdose days after being released from prison, an inquest has found, prompting the coroner and his mother to call for urgent changes to safeguarding services.
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

Daniel John Varndell, 30, was found dead in a property in Brownlow Close, Buckland, Portsmouth, on May 11, 2020 as a result of mixed drug intoxication, four days after his release from HMP Lewes in East Sussex.

Now a coroner and Daniel's mother, Paula Bramble, are calling for changes to safeguarding services to avoid another tragic death.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Daniel, who was diagnosed with schizophrenia in 2008, had been sentenced to 18 months in prison after assaulting security officers at Gunwharf Quays in October 2018.

Daniel Varndell died at the age of 30 due to an overdose, an inquest has found.Daniel Varndell died at the age of 30 due to an overdose, an inquest has found.
Daniel Varndell died at the age of 30 due to an overdose, an inquest has found.

A meeting of more than 20 professionals decided that Daniel should be released if he had planned meetings with a mental health expert, but a probation officer later decided – without checking with anyone else – to remove this condition.

Now Hampshire coroner Rosamund Rhodes-Kemp has called on the government to address this power – so lives can be saved in the future.

Writing in a review to prevent future deaths, the coroner said: ‘It may not have affected the outcome in the present sad case, (but) such unilateral removal of a licence condition could result in a future death.’

Read More
Langford Road house collapse: Neighbours report 'awful cracks' in their homes be...
Paula Bramble with her son Daniel VarndellPaula Bramble with her son Daniel Varndell
Paula Bramble with her son Daniel Varndell
Hide Ad
Hide Ad

And Daniel’s mother wants her son’s death to spark changes across prison and mental health services.

According to Paula, the prison had applied for Daniel to be supported by a mental health hospital – but no support was secured.

The Waterlooville resident said: ‘For me, it comes down to (the fact that) our mental health services declined to help him. Even if he didn't want to, that's what sectioning is there for.

‘Since he was 16, we knew there was clearly mental health problems going on. For six years from aged 19 he was sectioned in mental health hospitals. He was all over the country in different hospitals.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

‘In the last three years of his life, it was a matter of days between him being released and then being back in prison.

‘He felt safer in prison than outside. All of it was definitely attributable to his mental health. When he was well, he was loving and caring. He had a cheeky smile. He loved nothing more than getting a room laughing.'

Addressing the inquest process - which took more than two and a half years, she added: ‘I feel it was disgusting how late reports and statements were submitted. I didn’t feel I was being listened to.

‘I couldn't have got through it without support from the charity Inquest and the legal support they found me.’

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

But Paula is ‘grateful’ for changes undertaken at Dickson House, a facility for those returning from prison in Fareham, where Daniel lived after his release in May 2020.

The service has changed its alarm protocol so that staff call police as soon as possible, as a precaution in case the home’s alarm system is delayed or fails in calling emergency services, according to Paula.

Aimee Jones of Harding Evans solicitors, who represented the family, said: ‘Daniel was a very vulnerable man who required appropriate support following his release from prison.

‘The removal of a licence condition that would have required Daniel to engage with mental health services was wholly inappropriate, particularly given the extensive planning that had gone into Daniel’s safe release. We welcome the coroner’s report for the Prevention of Future Deaths and await the response.’