Police release image of transgender with abuse images who made New Year's resolution to have sex with girl

Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now
Police have released the custody image of a 56-year-old charity shop worker who was jailed for two years for possessing “abhorrent” child porn - after being cleared by a jury of exposing herself to two 11-year-old girls.

Samantha Norris. Pic: Hants policeSamantha Norris. Pic: Hants police
Samantha Norris. Pic: Hants police

Samantha Norris, who is in the process of gender transitioning, pleaded guilty to three charges of making indecent images of children of categories A, B and C, one count of possessing prohibited images of children and a charge of possessing an extreme pornographic image depicting a person engaging in sexual activity with an animal.

She entered the pleas following the trial where she was cleared of charges of engaging in sexual activity in the presence of a child and of indecent exposure. Norris had made a New Year's resolution to have sex with a girl under 10 this year.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

As well as the prison sentence, Judge Nicholas Rowland made Norris, of Ringwood, subject to a sexual harm prevention order for 10 years. Southampton Crown Court heard that the defendant had 16,000 images of children including about 2,000 still and 121 moving images of category A seriousness. The images included children aged as young as three with others showing youngsters aged about six in “distress and pain”, the court heard.

Sentencing Norris, judge Rowland said that Norris had also in her possession written notes describing sexual fantasies involving a four-and-a-half year old child and a “New Year’s resolution to have sex with a girl under 10”.

He told the defendant: “It’s all about you Samantha Norris and not the victims. You do not accept they are victims, you have distorted views and you do not feel your offending should be treated as serious – how would a right-minded person think about that?

“Your views are alarming and complex – you present a high risk of harm to children. It’s pretty blatant to me that you decided not to enter guilty pleas (earlier) as these pleas would have gone in front of the jury on the other (exposure) matters.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

During the trial for the exposure and sexual activity charges of which Norris was cleared, the prosecution had claimed that the defendant had “exposed her penis” deliberately to the two youngsters through the window of her flat.

But Norris, who worked at a Sue Ryder charity shop, told the court that she was a naturist who was “habitually naked” in her own home and the children could only have seen her naked if they had been “spying” on her.

She also said that she had been the victim of abuse from youngsters in the town and she felt these girls had been “taunting” her.

Related topics: